Fortran array of derived type vs derived type arrays

In Fortran, we are allowed to create a derived data type:

type vig_
    double precision :: L
    double precision :: D_i
    double precision :: D_o
end type vig_

type(vig_) :: vig

My question is about performance when using derived data types.

I can create an array of the derived type:

type vig1_
    double precision :: L
    double precision :: D_i
    double precision :: D_o
end type vig1_


type(vig1_), allocatable :: vig1(:)

! ...
allocate(vig1(n))
! ...

or a derived data type of arrays:

type vig2_

    double precision, allocatable :: L(:)
    double precision, allocatable :: D_i(:)
    double precision, allocatable :: D_o(:)
end type vig2_

type(vig2_) :: vig2

! ...
allocate( vig2%L(n) , vig2%D_i(n) , vig2%D_o(n) )
! ...

Of course there is a difference, but what exactly is the difference between both approaches? Which is faster? If I want to call a subroutine with these values, which performs better?

! option 1
do k=1,n
    call foo1( vig1(k) )
end do

! option 2

do k=1,n
    call foo2( vig2%L(k) , vig2%D_i(k) , vig2%D_o(k) )
end do

subroutine foo1(vig)
    type(vig1_) :: vig
end subroutine foo1

subroutine foo2(L,D_i,D_o)
    double precision :: L, D_i, D_o

end subroutine foo2